|
Detailed
Explanation of Methodology for Commercial Calculations
Commercial Sector Energy Savings
Data on current energy use are from the Energy Information Administration
(EIA) 1995 and 1999 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS)
data by building type, end use (space conditioning (HVAC), water heating,
lighting, cooking, refrigeration, office equipment, and other), and
for new construction also by building size and climate (see below).
Major energy sources include electricity, natural gas, propane, and
fuel oil. RMI calculations based on EIA data were used as the baseline
for energy use in new commercial construction.
Energy savings potentials were calculated by RMI and other
energy experts by building type and end use as follows:
| Savings
By End Use and Building Type * * For Existing Buildings, LOW
ESTIMATES |
|
Space Heating |
Cooling |
Ventilation |
Water Heating |
Lighting |
Cooking * |
Refrig-
eration * |
Office Equipment * |
Education |
30% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
|
|
|
Food Sales |
30% |
30% |
30% |
10% |
30% |
|
20% |
|
Food Service |
10% |
30% |
30% |
20% |
30% |
10% |
10% |
|
Health Care |
30% |
20% |
20% |
30% |
30% |
|
|
10% |
Lodging |
30% |
20% |
20% |
30% |
30% |
|
|
|
Mercantile and Service |
10% |
20% |
20% |
10% |
20% |
|
|
|
Office |
20% |
30% |
30% |
10% |
20% |
|
|
20% |
Public Assembly |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
|
|
|
Warehouse and Storage |
10% |
10% |
10% |
10% |
10% |
|
|
|
State/Local Government |
20% |
30% |
30% |
20% |
20% |
|
|
20% |
Federal Government |
20% |
30% |
30% |
20% |
20% |
|
|
20% |
Savings
By End Use and Building Type * * For Existing Buildings, HIGH
ESTIMATES |
|
Space Heating |
Cooling |
Ventilation |
Water Heating |
Lighting |
Cooking * |
Refrig-
eration * |
Office Equipment * |
Education |
60% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
|
|
|
Food Sales |
50% |
60% |
60% |
40% |
60% |
|
60% |
|
Food Service |
40% |
60% |
60% |
50% |
60% |
40% |
50% |
|
Health Care |
60% |
50% |
50% |
60% |
60% |
|
|
40% |
Lodging |
50% |
50% |
50% |
60% |
60% |
|
|
|
Mercantile and Service |
40% |
50% |
50% |
40% |
50% |
|
|
|
Office |
50% |
60% |
60% |
40% |
50% |
|
|
50% |
Public Assembly |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
|
|
|
Warehouse and Storage |
30% |
30% |
30% |
30% |
40% |
|
|
|
State/Local Government |
50% |
60% |
60% |
50% |
50% |
|
|
50% |
Federal Government |
50% |
60% |
60% |
50% |
50% |
|
|
50% |
Savings By End
Use and Building Type for New Construction
FOR BOTH LOAD AND SKIN DOMINATED BUILDINGS * *
|
|
Space
Heating |
Cooling |
Ventilation |
Water
Heating |
Lighting |
Cooking * |
Refrig-
eration * |
Office
Equipment * |
Low |
30% |
30% |
30% |
20% |
30% |
|
|
20% |
High |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
|
|
30-35% |
* For each building category, we assumed, for the purposes
of this analysis, that energy efficiency measures would be focused on
the areas that used the most energy, and therefore promised the greatest
return on investment. The shaded areas are not major energy users for
those building types, and therefore energy efficiency efforts in those
areas were assumed to not be significant.
* * The Energy Information Administration (EIA) data that
drive the Finder's calculations are broken out in a number of different
ways: by building type, energy end use (how energy is used in the building),
building age, climate, and building size, among others. Data are available
for two variables at a time, for example, by building type and energy
end use or by building size and climate, but not by three, for example,
by building type, climate, and energy end use. Although the most accurate
results could be obtained by including as many of these variables as
possible, these data limitations (and the scope of the data entry section,
which was designed to be an "overview" exercise, not an exhaustive
building-by-building audit) required the designers of the Finder to
use just two variables.
For existing commercial space, the Finder uses building type
(e.g. office and lodging) and energy end use (e.g. heating
and lighting), which the designers felt best supported both data collection
and targeting of energy efficiency programs. (It's more reasonable to
target a particular sector--e.g. the lodging industry than it is to
implement energy efficiency in all buildings older than 25 years in
age.) In summary, for commercial building calculations, the Finder uses
a national average of energy consumption for a particular type
of building by energy end use .
For new commercial space, the Finder distinguishes first between buildings
that are smaller than 50, 000 square feet and those that are larger than
50, 000 square feet. For those that are smaller than 50, 000 square feet,
energy savings estimates are then calculated by climate zone
and energy end use . For buildings that are larger than 50, 000
square feet, savings estimates are calculated by energy end use
only.
The reasoning for this is as follows:
Buildings that are smaller than
50, 000 square feet have energy demands that are "
skin dominated."
That is, heating and cooling energy demands are largely driven by climate
and are heavily influenced by how well-suited the building skin, or
envelope, is for that climate. Buildings that are larger than 50, 000
square feet typically have energy demands that are "
load dominated."
That is, heating and cooling energy demands are largely driven by the
internal loads of the building (predominantly the heat produced by lighting,
equipment and people), which are large enough to dwarf climate-related
energy demands.
CBECS data on fuel types used for space heating, cooling,
water heating, and cooking were used to calculate energy savings, dollar
savings, and emissions reductions. (Ventilation, lighting, and refrigeration
were assumed to be 100 percent electric.) For example, natural gas is
used to heat water for 51 percent of the commercial floorspace, electricity
43 percent, fuel oil 4 percent and propane 2 percent.
Example of how total
energy savings estimates are calculated for the results section:
Energy Savings
Energy savings for water heating is estimated to be 20 percent on the
low end for existing buildings used for educational purposes. That 20
percent savings estimate is applied individually to each of the different
energy sources used for water heating. This is important, because each
fuel source has different costs and emissions factors, with electricity
being the highest in both categories, and to obtain accurate results,
each source must be treated individually. The estimates of savings potential
in water heating is then calculated as a weighted average based on all
energy sources used for water heating. The same is done for all other
energy end uses. Then the total energy savings potential for
the low estimate is calculated as a weighted average based on the percent
of total energy use dedicated to each of the major energy end uses.
The same process is repeated for each building type for the low and
the high estimate. For new construction, building types are first separated
by size (greater than or less than 50, 000 square feet) and the calculations
are performed in a similar manner, but with climate (instead of buildling
type) as an additional distinguishing factor for buildings smaller than
50, 000 square feet.
Dollar Savings
The Finder relies on your data (or default data) for the costs of electricity,
natural gas, fuel oil, and propane to calculate current energy expenditures
and cost savings. As with the energy savings, dollar savings were calculated
by applying savings factors to the costs of each fuel type used in each
energy end use (such as space conditioning and water heating).
Emissions Reductions
The Finder generates data on fossil fuel emissions (and reductions in
emissions) for three major pollutants: carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur
oxides (SOx), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Additional toxic air pollutants
such as mercury, which can be released from a number of sources including
coal fired power plants and waste incinerators, are of great concern,
but are not included in this analysis due to a lack of reliable, accessible
data. Calculations on emissions and emissions reductions for natural
gas, fuel oil, and propane are derived from standard emissions factors
from the Energy Information Administration.
Data on emissions associated with electricity are from
one of twenty-seven power regions in the U.S. power grid. Users can
access these data from the EPA’s Power Profiler tool, which is
populated by data from the eGRID database, a comprehensive source of
data on the environmental characteristics of virtually all electric
power generated in the United States. The twenty-seven power regions
are the finest level of detail for which accurate data are available.
Emissions reductions for electricity are assumed to be
reductions in source energy, or the energy produced at the power source,
as opposed to site energy, or delivered energy, which is diminished
by line losses—the loss of electricity during transmission from
the power source to the consumer. Therefore, by basing emissions reductions
on source electricity reductions, we are assuming that each kilowatt-hour
saved by a consumer equals a kilowatt-hour saved at the power source
Job Creation
Estimates of jobs created from energy efficiency programs are derived
from a model developed by John “Skip” Laitner at the U.S.
EPA. Skip can be reached at Laitner.Skip@epamail.epa.gov
for questions.
|